Multiple non-linear Regressions:
Suppose you found
out from the scatter diagram that the relation between the number of apartments
demanded and the independent variables is a non-linear relationship, in the power
functional form:
You can still use
the LS method to run the regression, and estimate the demand function in the
following log-linear form:
log Q = log B0 + B1
log P + B2 log AD + B3 log Dist
In the log-linear
form, the coefficients of logP and LogAD and logDIS measure the elasticity with
respect to each of the three independent variables.
[(∆logQ/∆logP)
= B1= (%∆Q/%∆P) = EP].
To run this
regression, copy the data of the example solved in the last lecture in a new
excel file and call it Example 2, then convert the data into logarithm. To do
that, click in an empty cell where you want your fist cell of the logarithmic
data to appear, type the formula for the logarithm [for example if the first
data value fall in a2 cell, just choose an empty cell where you want your
logarithmic values to appear and write
in [ =log10(a2)] and hit enter. The log of the first entry in Q column
will show in the chosen cell, copy the content of that cell down to get the log
of all values in Q, and horizontally to get the logarithmic values for the rest
of the variables. Now, proceed in the same steps you have learned in the last
lecture to get regression estimates. Make sure you have a printout similar to
that presented on next page. Now, using the information in the output print
answer the following questions:
1.
Write the demand equation.
2.
Check the signs of the three
variables, which signs do not conform to the theory of demand?
3.
What is the value of the price
elasticity of demand, what does it mean?
4.
What other elasticities can you
find in the results?
5.
Explain the meaning of the R
square.
6.
Comment on the significance of the
effect of the explanatory variables.
7.
What does the significance level of
F statistic tells you?
8.
The firm owning this apartment
complex suffered for years from low profit rates, as a result of an average
vacancy rate of nearly 40%. In light of the estimates obtained, what is your
advice to the firm. Should the firm move its apartments closer to the
university? I’m sure you have better ideas.
9.
What other variables do you think should
be added to this model and which variables should be omitted?
Q
|
P
|
AD
|
Dis
|
log Q
|
log P
|
log AD
|
log Dis
|
28
|
250
|
11
|
12
|
1.44715803
|
2.39794
|
1.041393
|
1.079181
|
69
|
400
|
24
|
6
|
1.83884909
|
2.60205
|
1.380211
|
0.778151
|
43
|
450
|
15
|
5
|
1.63346846
|
2.65321
|
1.176091
|
0.69897
|
32
|
550
|
31
|
7
|
1.50514998
|
2.74036
|
1.491362
|
0.845098
|
42
|
575
|
34
|
4
|
1.62324929
|
2.75966
|
1.531479
|
0.60206
|
72
|
375
|
22
|
2
|
1.8573325
|
2.57403
|
1.342423
|
0.30103
|
66
|
375
|
12
|
5
|
1.81954394
|
2.57403
|
1.079181
|
0.69897
|
49
|
450
|
24
|
7
|
1.69019608
|
2.65321
|
1.380211
|
0.845098
|
70
|
400
|
22
|
4
|
1.84509804
|
2.60205
|
1.342423
|
0.60206
|
60
|
375
|
10
|
5
|
1.77815125
|
2.57403
|
1
|
0.69897
|
SUMMARY OUTPUT
|
|||||||
Regression Statistics
|
|||||||
Multiple R
|
0.727198
|
||||||
0.528817
|
|||||||
Adjusted
|
0.293226
|
||||||
Standard Error
|
0.124585
|
||||||
Observations
|
10
|
||||||
ANOVA
|
|||||||
df
|
SS
|
MS
|
F
|
Significance F
|
|||
Regression
|
3
|
0.104519
|
0.03484
|
2.24463564
|
0.183571
|
||
Residual
|
6
|
0.093128
|
0.015521
|
||||
Total
|
9
|
0.197647
|
|||||
Coefficients
|
Standard Error
|
t Stat
|
P-value
|
||||
Intercept
|
2.828655
|
1.411635
|
2.003815
|
0.09193898
|
|||
log P
|
-0.2344
|
0.631537
|
-0.37116
|
0.72327068
|
|||
log AD
|
-0.08786
|
0.333757
|
-0.26324
|
0.80117571
|
|||
log Dis
|
-0.55973
|
0.215898
|
-2.59255
|
0.04107075
|
1 . The demand equation :
Log Q = 2.83 – 0.23 log
P -0.088 log AD – 0.56Log Dis
2 . AD was found to be the only variable that has
a wrong sign. Advertising is expected to
have a positive effect on Q. In other words, AD should have a positive sign.
3 . The value of the price elasticity of demand 0.23
It means that a 1% increase in P will decrease Q by 0.23%.
4 . The AD elasticity of demand 0.9 and the Dis elasticity of demand 0.56
5. The R2 of 52% indicate that, % 52
of the variation in the number of demanded apartment is explained by variations
in P , AD and Dis ,while 48% of these variation are due to other variables not
included in the model .
6 . From the results, P- value is greater than 5%
for P and AD, which means that both variables have no significant effect on Q,
therefore, the researcher may not reject the null hypothesis for these two
vsriables. DIS has a P-value of 4%, less than the acceptable probability of
error in the estimation. Therefore, we conclude that DIS has a significant
negative effect on Q. So, the researcher may reject the null hypothesis (H0:
B3 = 0) and accept the alternative hypothesis
(H1: B3
< 0)
7 . F significance of 0.1836 (18%) is greater
than 5%, the acceptable probability of error in the estimated coefficients. We
conclude that ( P , AD , and Dis ) together
have no significant effect on Q. The null hypothesis (H0: B1
= B2= B3 0)should not be rejected.
8 . We might increase the profits by two ways
either by increasing the ( P ) since
Ep<1 or by providing other services .
9 . We should add ( Income & Complement ) and
we should omit the non significant variable ( AD ) .
No comments:
Post a Comment